Locate the current standard
Use your state department, district curriculum guide, or approved framework. Record the course, code, wording, and version/date.
Standards and curriculum page
The process works across states, districts, and subjects. The Florida Health Science example below simply makes the process concrete.
A framework-neutral process
State standards use different language and formats. The planning questions stay useful: What must students do? What content and language do they need? What evidence will show it?
Use your state department, district curriculum guide, or approved framework. Record the course, code, wording, and version/date.
Look for the action, content, context, conditions, and level of independence. Do not plan from an isolated verb.
Write a student-friendly target that preserves the rigor and names what students will know or do.
Choose the text, model, practice, discussion, demonstration, and product that will show the target.
Offer more than one pathway into the same goal, then add meaningful complexity for students ready to extend.
Check the final plan against the current official standard and your local course expectations.
Example only: Florida
Use your own state's current wording when planning. This Florida example demonstrates the method; it is not intended to replace local or state verification.
Sample Florida Health Science Core literacy expectation
Use reading strategies in technical subjects to determine the meaning of domain-specific words and phrases in a Health Science context.
Confirm the exact benchmark and course code in the current Florida Department of Education or CPALMS framework before teaching.
Find the action
Circle the verb. Does it ask students to identify, explain, compare, apply, evaluate, or create? The verb determines the level of thinking.
Name the content
List the concept, body system, process, safety practice, or domain-specific terms students must understand.
Plan the language
Decide what students will read, say, write, or listen for. Add word parts, visuals, sentence frames, and partner talk when they increase access.
Choose evidence
Design a quick check that matches the action. If the standard says explain, a matching quiz alone is not enough evidence.
Add access
Anticipate barriers for multilingual learners, struggling readers, students with disabilities, and students who need more processing time.
A teacher's final check
Before the lesson, make sure the activity measures the standard rather than simple completion, recall, or compliance.
The task matches the action in the standard.
Students will read, say, write, listen, or explain the target language.
I identified the essential vocabulary and planned how to make it visible.
Students will use the content in a meaningful context.
My evidence of learning will show the target, not just completion.
I planned access supports that preserve the same rigorous goal.
I planned an extension that increases complexity or transfer.
I know what I will do if the quick check shows confusion.